Review maps evidence for agentic multi-step AI in radiology workflows, finding early promise but no prospective validation

Review of agentic AI in radiology: GPT-4 catches 82.7% of report errors, matching humans; intelligent triage cut turnaround time ≤43.7%. But evidence is single-center, retrospective — prospective validation lacking.

• Multi-agent cross-verification reduces hallucination rates in report generation.
• All current evidence comes from single-center, retrospective studies on curated data; no prospective or multi-center trials exist.

Automated summary

RadPigeon summaries are original and for information only. They are not clinical advice.