GeneralResearch
Bibliometric analysis charts CT’s rise in forensic human identification and AI integration
Forensic science, medicine, and pathologyAug 6
Bibliometric analysis of CT use in human identification shows growing scientific output since 2015, with most studies assessing age and sex; Japan leads in citation impact. No significant link found between journal impact factor and citations.
- Most studies were observational, focusing on age and sex estimation.
- A methodological shift was observed with the progressive introduction of artificial intelligence.
- Gifu University had the highest citations per article, while Unicamp was the most productive institution; no significant association between journal impact factor and citations was found.
Automated summary
RadPigeon summaries are original and for information only. They are not clinical advice.