GeneralResearch
Bibliometric analysis charts CT’s rise in forensic human identification and AI integration
Forensic science, medicine, and pathologytoday
Bibliometric analysis of CT use in human identification shows growing scientific output since 2015, with most studies assessing age and sex; Japan leads in citation impact. No significant link found between journal impact factor and citations.
- Most studies were observational, focusing on age and sex estimation.
- A methodological shift was observed with the progressive introduction of artificial intelligence.
- Gifu University had the highest citations per article, while Unicamp was the most productive institution; no significant association between journal impact factor and citations was found.
Automated summary
RadPigeon summaries are original and for information only. They are not clinical advice.